How Does International Law Shape the Arab-Israeli Conflict?

 

The Arab-Israeli conflict is a long-standing and complex geopolitical disagreement that has been shaped by various factors. One of the bases of this conflict is the influence of international law and its interpretation. In fact, international law stands out as a critical force shaping the conflict’s trajectory.

Beginning in the early 20th century, the Arab-Israeli conflict has caused tension and unrest in the Middle East, killing thousands of innocent civilians and majorly affecting the region and the world.

Understanding The Importance of International Law

Before we get into how international law has shaped this landscape, it is important to understand the true nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict. From the very beginning, the conflict has revolved around claims to territory, particularly concerning the land of historic Palestine. Both parties, Israel and Palestine, lay claim to this land, viewing it as their rightful homeland.

But who does the land actually belong to? And what role does international law play in the whole geopolitical disagreement?

International law plays a crucial role in the Arab-Israeli conflict. From providing guidelines for dealing with territorial disputes and human rights issues to the use of force, international agreements have always paved the way. A way that has influenced the actions of involved parties and provided a basis for diplomatic initiatives.

From the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, which was guided by international law principles, to the ongoing peace negotiations, legal frameworks continue to directly influence the conflict.

Abraham A. Sion's book "To Whom Was The Promised Land Promised?" explores the historical and legal dimensions of the conflict – comparing the legal entitlements of each party to ascertain the rightful claim to the territory of Mandatory Palestine within the framework of international law.

The Dispute Over Territory

A key issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict is the disagreement over what was once Mandatory Palestine. Both sides cite international law, including self-determination and  Security Council Resolutions  242 and 338, to support their claims.

While the Arab nations argue that Israel's control of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem violates international law (these lands were taken during the 1967 Six-Day War), Israel argues its presence is a legitimate act  under international law, and advocates for resolution through negotiations.

But to whom was the “Promised Land” promised?

"To Whom Was The Promised Land Promised?" brings clarity amidst the fog of historical disputes and geopolitical maneuvering. Sion maintains a steadfast commitment to objectivity throughout his analysis. Unlike many works on the Arab-Israeli conflict, this book shuns moral judgments and political bias. It focuses solely on the legal merits of each party's claim. By sidestepping the quagmire of moral culpability and political posturing, Abraham A. Sion offers readers a clear and impartial assessment of the legal terrain.

If you are interested in learning more about the legal depths of the Arab-Israeli century-long conflict, reading "To Whom Was The Promised Land Promised?" will enlighten you with newfound clarity and understanding. 

Grab your copy of "To Whom Was The Promised Land Promised?" The book is now available on Amazon!